Fallacies Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Fallacies - engagement ExampleThe language fallacy creates an mould on the contributors of the article that the same issue occurs in the opposite communities located within the United States. People should not be misled by this fallacy. Language fallacy includes the part of language to create a dishonest impression on the people (Engel, 1994). Further, to ensure the veracity of the statement, a research should be conducted. Evidence Fallacy. The article offers an assertion that is not supported by evidence. The violation creates an impression or statement that is not verified by evidence (Austin, 2008). Identifying the evidence fallacy, the statement they leave alone lessen public assistance rolls substantially and give our nations welfargon reform effort a fighting chance to succeed. indicates a false impression that reducing public assistance rolls substantially pull up stakes automatically result to giving our nations welfare reform effort a fighting chance to succeed. T here are strong probabilities that reducing public assistance rolls substantially will not give our nations welfare reform a fighting chance to succeed. The news newsperson should have verified his or her data, prior to the presentation to the public. The reporter will be surprised that thee is a possibility that the government continues to implement other programs that will alleviate the nations drug and alcohol ab engage. Reasoning Fallacy. The author shows a reasoning fallacy. A reasoning fallacy crops up when the conclusions of the author are based on faulty gathering of supporting evidences. The author of the paper commits the unforgivable fallacy because of sanguineous analysis of the facts (Sprague, 2008). Identifying the reasoning fallacy, the statement State and local officials need not be mark as tax-and-spend liberals if they devote more resources to addressing these problems among welfare recipients. shows a generalization aspect of reasoning fallacy. The statement gives a false impression that all state and local officials are automatically tagged as tax-and-spend liberals if they devote more resources to addressing these problems among welfare recipients, giving an impression that the liberals are spendthrifts. Definitely, not all of the state and local officials should be tagged as tax-and-spend liberals because some state and local officials base their devoting more resources to the addressing these problems among welfare recipients on legal, evidential, and other legalise grounds that exempt them from being tagged as tax-and-spend liberals. The author should have reported the facts, not to untimely jump into conclusions. Using government funds to help the drug dependents and alcohol dependents should not be construed as unfavorable tax money allocation. Presence of fallacies. The fallacies diminish the quality of the authors arguments. The readers can use common sense to detect if the authors arguments are valid. By reading the article, the average reader will always say the statements, findings, or conclusions do not apply to all situations. There will always be exceptions to the authors proposals. The author should add more data and researches to back up his proposed concepts. The purpose of the authors fallacies is to increase acceptance of the author